The role of the nurse in the prevention and management of diabetes-related foot disease in the home care setting: a scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57177/idn.v19.355Keywords:
Diabetic Foot; Home care; Nursing; Prevention; Treatment; diabetic related foot diseaseAbstract
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to review and map the role of the nurse in the prevention and management of diabetes-related foot disease in the home care setting, as presented in the literature.
Introduction: Patients with diabetes mellitus at risk for or having a foot ulcer have substantial needs for nursing interventions. Nurses are responsible for the planning and evaluation of the care provided in accordance with the nursing process and they perform many of these nursing activities in collaboration with other health care professionals. As part of a well-functioning process, teamwork is crucial for high quality care. Nurses play a central role in that team. The protracted time to healing for diabetic foot ulcers necessitates lengthy relationships between the patient and nurses. Nurses perform regular dressing changes, help with medication, injections and other needs for assisted self-care in homecare settings. Nurses can also foresee and manage risk factors for ulceration on the feet, such as footwear, factors that can cause trauma to the feet, preventing fall injuries.
No compilation of studies regarding nursing activities performed in home care settings for patients with diabetic foot disease has been made, although there have been studies from home care settings.
Inclusion criteria: Registered nurses working with people with diabetes-related foot disease in home care.
Methods: A search will be conducted through three databases, Cinahl, LILACS and PubMed, using various keyword combinations focused on ‘the diabetic foot’ and ‘home care’. The search will be carried out in 2026 and updated before publication. No limitations will be applied to language and a 20-year limit on publication date will be enforced.
Downloads
References
1.
van Netten JJ, Raspovic A, Lavery LA, et al. Prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes at risk of ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40(3): e3652. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3652
2.
Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Fitridge R, Game F, et al. Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetes-related foot disease (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40(3): e3657. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3657
3.
Lazzarini PA, Cramb SM, Golledge J, et al. Global trends in the incidence of hospital admissions for diabetes-related foot disease and amputations: a review of national rates in the 21st century. Diabetologia 2023; 66: 267–87. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05845-9
4.
Hjelmgaard CMH, Berthelsen C, Kristensen MØ, Hansen CA. Diabetes-related foot ulcers: the role of informal caregivers’ experiences and needs regarding involvement in multidisciplinary team treatment. A qualitative study. Int Wound J 2026; 23(4): e70891. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70891
5.
Toğluk Yiğitoğlu E, Kaygu Ö, Saltoğlu N, Balkan İİ. Burden of caregivers of diabetic foot ulcers: a single-centre, descriptive cor-relational study in Türkiye. BMJ Open 2025; 15(6): e092676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092676
6.
Probst S, Seppänen S, Gethin G, et al. EWMA Document: Home care-wound care. J Wound Care 2014; 23 (5 Suppl.): S1–44. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.Sup5a.S1
7.
Annersten Gershater M, Pilhammar E, Alm Roijer C. Prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes in home nursing. Registered Nurses work. A qualitative interview study. Eur Diab Nurs. 2013; 10: 52–7. doi: 10.1002/edn.227
8.
Annersten Gershater M, Zdravkovic S, Elgzyri T. Changes in daily nursing needs and self-care capability of people with diabetes after in-hospital treatment for foot complications: A descriptive study. Nurs Open 2024; 11(5): e2186. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2186
9.
van Netten JJ, Bus SA, Apelqvist J, et al. Definitions and criteria for diabetes-related foot disease (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40(3) e3654. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3654
10.
European Parliament. European Union Directive. Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of profes-sional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System. Strasbourg 2013.
11.
Genet N, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, Bouman A, Francke AL, Fagerström C, et al. Home care in Europe: a systematic litera-ture review. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:207. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-207
12.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI; 2024. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global [cited 10 April 2026].
13.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8(1), 19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
14.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
15.
Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18(10), 2119–26. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
16.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7), 467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Magdalena Annersten-Gershater, Jan Apelqvist, Martina Vall, Natalia Santos, Marco Meloni, Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Vladimira Fejfarova, José Luis Lázaro Martínez, Georgina Gethin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
