A qualitative study of Finnish diabetes specialist nurses’ experiences and perceptions of the impacts of cognitive impairment in older adults with type 1 diabetes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57177/idn.v18.340Keywords:
diabetes mellitus type 1, nursing, cognitive dysfunction, ageing, self-management, qualitative researchAbstract
Background: Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are increasingly living into older age, when cognitive impairment (CI) may co-exist. T1D further increases the risk of CI, which can result in physical, psychological, and social impacts in the individual, their families, and/or informal carers. These factors also present professional challenges for the healthcare professionals (HCPs) who support them. Diabetes specialist nurses (DSNs) are well positioned to provide insights on the impact of CI in this group, suggest potential support solutions, and identify care delivery pathways aimed at improving outcomes. Previous research in this area is very limited.
Methods: Data were collected via individual semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of eight Finnish DSNs, with experience of working with older adults with T1D and CI. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to analyse the data.
Findings: Four key themes were identified: 1) indicators of CI; 2) impact of CI; 3) professional challenges; 4) solutions and care delivery. Our findings suggest a lack of consistent CI screening practices in this group and multiple impacts on an individual’s ability to self-manage. Potential hazards and increased care needs, in turn, affect their families/close social networks, as well as care providers. Participants suggested several solutions, including: the value of a consistent therapeutic nurse/patient/family relationship, non-stigmatising early screening and identification of CI, advanced care planning, and patient education involving the person and their families. Incorporating a multi-disciplinary team approach, and the development of CI-specific education and guidelines for carers, HCPs, and policy makers, were identified as key priorites.
Conclusion: There are several impacts of T1D complicated by CI. However, our participants were able to identify mitigating strategies and solutions that deserve further exploration and implementation. Whilst this study was based in Finland, the results may be applicable to other geographical locations with similarly increasing prevalence rates of CI in T1D.
Downloads
References
1.
Harjutsalo V. Tyypin 1 diabeteksen ennuste on parantunut. Lääketieteellinen aikakausikirja Duodecim. 2018; 134(16): 1541–42. Available from: https://www.duodecimlehti.fi/duo14465 [cited 20 November 2025].
2.
Bispham JA, Hughes AS, Driscoll KA, McAuliffe-Fogarty AH. Novel challenges in aging with type 1 diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2020; 20(5): 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-01298-9
3.
International Diabetes Federation. Type 1 diabetes estimates in children and adults: T1D Index report. International Diabetes Federation; 2022. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/idf-diabetes-atlas-reports/type-1-diabetes-estimates-in-children-and-adults/ [cited 25 July 2025].
4.
Shalimova A, Graff B, Gąsecki D, Wolf J, Sabisz A, Szurowska E, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 104(6): 2239–49. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01315
5.
Topo P, Sormunen S, Saarikalle K, Räikkönen O, Eloniemi-Sulkava U. Kohtaamisia dementiahoidon arjessa: havainnointitutkimus hoidon laadusta asiakkaan näkökulmasta. Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysalan tutkimus- ja kehittämiskeskus STAKES; 2007. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201901232767 [cited 04 December 2025].
6.
Pekkala S. Dementiaan liittyvät puheen, kielen ja kommunikaation muutokset. In: Korpilahti P, Aaltonen O, Laine M, eds. Kieli ja aivot: kommunikaation perusteet, häiriöt ja kuntoutus (pp. 293–9). Turku: Kognitiivisen neurotieteen tutkimuskeskus, Turun yliopisto; 2010.
7.
Chaytor NS, Barbosa-Leiker C, Ryan CM, Germine LT, Hirsch IB, Weinstock RS. Clinically significant cognitive impairment in older adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complic. 2019; 33(1): 91–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.04.003
8.
Brands AM, Biessels GJ, De Haan EH, Kappelle LJ, Kessels RP. The effects of type 1 diabetes on cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(3): 726–35. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.726
9.
Kodl CT, Seaquist ER. Cognitive dysfunction and diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev. 2008; 29(4): 494–511. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0034
10.
Dhaliwal R, Weinstock RS. Management of type 1 diabetes in older adults. Diabetes Spectr. 2014; 27(1): 9–20. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.27.1.9
11.
Kilvert A, Fox C. The challenges of type 1 diabetes in older people. Pract Diabetes. 2015; 32(5): 175–9. doi: 10.1002/pdi.1952
12.
Bettany-Saltikov J. How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: a step-by-step guide. London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2012.
13.
Porritt K, Gomersall J, Lockwood C. JBI’s systematic reviews: study selection and critical appraisal. Am J Nurs. 2014; 114(6):47–52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000450430.97383.64
14.
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016; 26(13): 1753–60. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
15.
World Health Organization. Adaptation and translation guide: translation process for WHO instruments (Version 1.0). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/10665/366278/WHO-MSD-GSEDpackage-v1.0-2023.9-eng.pdf [cited 12 April 2025].
16.
Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quan. 2018; 52(4): 1893–907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
17.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
18.
Braun V, Clarke V. What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2014; 9(1): 26152. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
19.
Maguire M, Delahunt B. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2017; 9(3): 3351. Available from: http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335/553 [cited 20 November 2025].
20.
Ayres L. Thematic coding and analysis. In Given LM, ed. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 868–9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd; 2008.
21.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (Version 12). 2018. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home [cited 06 January 2023].
22.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20): 2191–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
23.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Fanjiang G. Mini-mental state examination: MMSE-2. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2010.
24.
Worldometer. Finland demographics 2025 (population, age, sex, trends). 2025. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/demographics/finland-demographics/ [cited 25 July 2025].
25.
Munshi MN. Cognitive dysfunction in older adults with diabetes: what a clinician needs to know. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(4): 461–7. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1229
26.
Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 385(9984): 2255–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5
27.
Biessels GJ, Whitmer RA. Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: how to implement emerging guidelines. Diabetologia. 2020; 63(1): 3–9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-04977-9
28.
Sinclair AJ, Dunning T, Colagiuri S. Managing older people with type 1 diabetes: global guidance. Diabet Med. 2015; 32(2): 161–75. doi: 10.1111/dme.12683
29.
Litchman ML, Wawrzynski SE, Allen NA, Tracy EL, Kelly CS, Helgeson VS, et al. Yours, mine, and ours: a qualitative analysis of the impact of type 1 diabetes management in older adult married couples. Diabetes Spectr. 2019; 32(3): 239–48. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0057
30.
Sinclair AJ, Dunning T, Dhatariya K, an International Group of Experts, Sheu WH. H., Lin SY, et al. Clinical guidelines for type 1 diabetes mellitus with an emphasis on older adults: an executive summary. Diabet Med. 2020; 37(1): 53–70. doi: 10.1111/dme.14135
31.
Taboada Gjorup AL, Snoek FJ, van Duinkerken E. Diabetes self-care in older adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: how does cognition influence self-management. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2021; 2: 727029. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.727029
32.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374: n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Johanna Grönholm, Angus Forbes, Maya Allen-Taylor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
