The experiences of professional footcare among adults living with type 2 diabetes in Switzerland: a qualitative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57177/idn.v17.330Abstract
Background: Foot ulceration is a common complication of type 2 diabetes, which can lead to amputations and earlier mortality. National footcare guidelines recommend routine foot surveillance, preventative self-management patient education and prompt referral to professional footcare services when complications occur. However, little is known about how people living with type 2 diabetes experience diabetes footcare in Switzerland. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of people living with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk for foot complications, when accessing and using professional footcare, in the context of the Swiss healthcare system.
Method: Individual, in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 9) recruited from two regional hospitals and two primary care practices in the German-speaking region of Switzerland. Data were analysed thematically using Framework Analysis.
Results: Three themes with subthemes were generated from the data: 1) footcare, the neglected component of diabetes management; 2) perceived roles of healthcare professionals; and 3) signposting within the healthcare system. The findings illustrated ambiguity and lack of consistency in the provision of services, which do not always align to national guidelines, as well as a lack of clarity of the roles of healthcare professionals in relation to diabetic footcare.
Conclusion: The experiences of participants in this study highlight the need for increased awareness and new ways of working, including alignment to national guidelines and a clarification of the roles and responsibilities of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, including general practitioners, diabetes nurses and specialist podiatrists within primary care in Switzerland.
Downloads
References
International Diabetes Federation. IDF atlas. 10th ed. IDF; 2021. Available from: www.diabetesatlas.org [cited 28 March 2021].
Zhang P, Lu J, Jing Y, Tang S, Zhu D, Bi Y. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med 2017; 49(2): 101–16. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932
Crawford F, Cezard G, Chappell FM, Murray GD, Price JF, Sheikh A, et al. A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS). Health Technol Assess 2015; 19(57): 1–210. doi: 10.3310/hta19570
Rossboth S, Lechleitner M, Oberaigner W. Risk factors for diabetic foot complications in type 2 diabetes – A systematic review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2021; 4(1): e00175. doi: 10.1002/edm2.175
Bolton AJM. Foot problems in people with diabetes. In: Holt RIG, Cockram CS, Flyvbjerg A, Goldstein BJ, editor. Textbook of diabetes. 5th ed. London: Wiley, Blackwell; 2017, pp. 701–15.
Burgess JL, Wyant WA, Abdo Abujamra B, Kirsner RS, Jozic I. Diabetic Wound-Healing Science. Medicina 2021; 57(10):1072.
Simon C, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Fitridge R, Game F, et al. Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetes-related foot disease: IWGDF 2023 update; 2023. Available from: https://iwgdfguidelines.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/IWGDF-2023-01-Practical-Guidelines.pdf [cited 30 March 2024].
Bus SA, Sacco ICN, Monteiro-Soares M, Raspovic A, Paton J, Rasmussen A, et al. Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: IWGDF 2023 update: International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot; 2023. Available from: URL: https://iwgdfguidelines.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/IWGDF-2023-02-Prevention-Guideline.pdf [cited 28 March 2024].
van Netten JJ, Raspovic A, Lavery LA, Monteiro-Soares M, Rasmussen A, Sacco ICN, et al. Prevention of foot ulcers in the at-risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review. 2020; 36(S1): e3270. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3270
Bus SA, van Netten JJ. A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32(Suppl 1): 195–200. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2738
Chappuis B, Chiesa G, Divorne M, Fischer-Taeschler D, Iselin H-U, Malgaroli M, et al. Eckwerte des Fuss-Managements bei Typ 2 – Diabetes mellitus in der Grundversorgung: Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Endokrinologie und Diabetologie SGED; 2014. Available from: https://www.sgedssed.ch/SgedSsed/fileadmin/6_Diabetologie/65_Fussversorgung/Fuss-Managements_bei_DM2_2013.pdf [cited 28 March 2024].
Lavery LA, Peters EJG, Williams JR, Murdoch DP, Hudson A, Lavery DC. Reevaluating the way we classify the diabetic foot: restructuring the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(1): 154–6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1302
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016; 26(13): 1753–60. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
Chen H-Y, Boore JRP. Translation and back-translation in qualitative nursing research: methodological review. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19(1–2): 234–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02896.x
Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students & researchers. 2 rev. ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using framework analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs 2013; 69(11): 2423–31. doi: 10.1111/jan.12127
Coffey L, Mahon C, Gallagher P. Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Wound J 2019; 16(1): 183–210. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13010
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo; Released in 2020. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home. [cited 21 January 2020].
Gerrish K, Lathlen J. The research process in nursing. 7th ed. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell; 2015.
Gale L, Vedhara K, Searle A, Kemple T, Campbell R. Patients’ perspectives on foot complications in type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58(553): 555–63. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319657
Searle A, Gale L, Campbell R, Wetherell M, Dawe K, Drake N, et al. Reducing the burden of chronic wounds: prevention and management of the diabetic foot in the context of clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13(Suppl 3): 82–91. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008011
Delea S, Buckley C, Hanrahan A, McGreal G, Desmond D, McHugh S. Management of diabetic foot disease and amputation in the Irish health system: a qualitative study of patients’ attitudes and experiences with health services. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 251. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0926-9
Hjelm K, Apelqvist J. Influence of beliefs about health and illness on self-care and care-seeking in foreign-born people with diabetic foot ulcers: dissimilarities related to origin. J Wound Care 2016; 25(11): 602–611. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.11.602
Jones SL. Diabetes case management in primary care: The New Brunswick experience and expanding the practice of the certified diabetes educator nurse into primary care. Can J Diabetes 2015; 39(4): 322–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.12.006
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Type 2 diabetes in adults: management: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28 [cited 28 March 2024].
Davis J, Fischl AH, Beck J, Browning L, Carter A, Condon JE et al. 2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support. Diabetes Care 2022; 45(2):484–94.
Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Bordet J, Burnand B. Diabetes care in Switzerland: good, but perfectible: a population-based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; (13): 232. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/232 [cited 28 March 2024].
Supper I, Catala O, Lustman M, Chemla C, Bourgueil Y, Letrilliart L. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Public Health 2014; 37(4): 716–27. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu102
Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Astrid Castelberg, Maya Allen-Taylor, Rita Forde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
