Self-monitoring of blood glucose: psychological barriers and benefits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.122Keywords:
Psychological barriers, behaviour, self-monitoring of blood glucose, biopsychosocial model, feedbackAbstract
AbstractDiabetes is to a large extent a self-managed disease and, in this context, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is essential, at least for insulin-treated patients. In practice, the uptake of SMBG is generally low: many patients fail to self-regulate their treatment appropriately. By contrast, a minority of diabetes patients very frequently self-test their blood glucose levels each day to achieve strict glycaemic control. These differences in usage of self-monitoring are largely explained by psychological and social factors. We present a 5-step biopsychosocial model of SMBG – from decision to test (or not), to evaluation of outcomes – that may help to identify and address perceived barriers and benefits from the patient’s perspective. Understanding the fundamental psychological principles that underlie SMBG behaviour is a prerequisite to the effective education and counselling of patients who experience problems with SMBG. New technologies are likely to increase the precision of measurement and patient convenience, but not the fundamental challenge of managing negative feedback as part of self-regulating behaviour.
Downloads
References
Harris MI, Cowie CC, Howie E, Self-monitoring of, blood glucose by adults with diabetes in the United States population. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 1116–1123.
Vincze G, Barner JC, Lopez D, Factors associated with adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose among persons with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2004; 30: 112–125.
Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, et al. Longitudinal study of new and prevalent use of self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1757–1763.
Bergenstal RM, Gavin JR, III. The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference. Am J Med 2005; 118 (Suppl 9A): 1S–6S.
Wysocki T. The psychological context of SMBG. Diabetes Spectrum 1994; 7: 266–270.
Miller SM. Monitoring and blunting in the face of threat: implications for adaptation and health. In: Montada L, Filip S, Lerner M, editors. Life crises and loss in the adult years. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992: 225–273.
Mollema ED, Snoek FJ, Ader HJ, et al. Insulin-treated diabetes patients with fear of self-injecting or self-testing: psychological comorbidity and general well-being. J Psychosom Res 2001; 51: 665–671.
Farmer A, Gibson OJ, Tarassenko L, et al A systematic review of telemedicine interventions to support blood glucose monitoring in diabetes. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 1372–1378.
Persons JB, Miranda J. Cognitive theories of vulnerability to depression: Reconciling negative evidence. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1992; 16: 485–502.
Leventhal H, Brisette I, Leventhal EA. The common sense models of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of Health and Illness behavior. London: Routlegde Taylor 8c Francis group, 2003: 42–61.
Seligman ME, Weiss J, Weinraub M, et al Coping behavior: learned helplessness, physiological change and learned inactivity. Behav Res Ther 1980; 18: 459–512.
Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick L, Ritterband L, et al. Blood Glucose Awareness Training: what is it, where is it and where is it going? Diabetes Spectrum 2006; 19: 43–49.
Snoek FJ, Mollema ED, Heine RJ, et al Development and validation of the diabetes fear of injecting and self-testing questionnaire (D-FISQ): first findings. Diabet Med 1997; 14: 871–876.
Peel E, Douglas M, Lawton J, Self monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: longitudinal qualitative study of patients' perspectives. BMJ 2007; 335: 493–498.
Moreland EC, Volkening LK, Lawlor MT, et al. Use of a blood glucose monitoring manual to enhance monitoring adherence in adults with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 689–695.
Anderson BJ, Vangsness L, Connell A, et al. Family conffict, adherence and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2002; 19: 635–642.
Pichert JW, Campbell K, Cox DJ, et al Psychology of Glucose Data Proliferation Symposium group. Issues for the coming age of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Educ 2000; 26: 969–980.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Copyright © 2008 FEND
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.