Diabetes specialist nurse telephone helpline: A survey of incoming and out-going calls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.120Keywords:
Diabetes specialist nurse, workload, telephone helpline, phone contact, diabetes mellitusAbstract
AbstractBackground: Numerous telephone calls for advice on diabetes-related issues are received by diabetes specialist nurses (DSNs), but resources required to deal with such calls are rarely formally identified.
Aim: To identify the number, duration, nature of calls, type of callers and impact of calls on DSN workload, in order to help plan future requirements of diabetes services.
Methods: In preparation for restructuring how diabetes services are provided locally, a record of all calls made in relation to the diabetes clinic’s helpline during June 2007 was collated. Date and time, type of caller, duration and nature of call were recorded.
Results: In June 2007, there were 386 calls (mean [range] 18.4 [4–33] calls per day). Duration was recorded for 80 of the calls, which took up 335 minutes in total, giving an average of 4.2 minutes per call. This gives an estimated total call time of approximately 1621 minutes’ (27 h) during the month. Of the 386 calls, 6% were from general practitioners, 10% from practice nurses, 44% from patients, 4% from nursing homes, 4% from care providers/relatives and 32% from others (ward nurses, doctors, dietitians, district nurses, diabetes care technicians and other primary care trust staff).
Conclusion: The helpline is heavily used and its impact on DSN workload is considerable. Appropriate resource allocation is necessary when planning for the future requirements of patients with diabetes.
Downloads
References
Department of Health. Improving Diabetes Services — The NSF Two Years On. 2005. //www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4106716?IdcServiceGET_FILESMID35688cRenditionWeb [Accessed 3 July 2008].
Department of Health. 2001. National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standards. //www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4002951?IdcServiceGET_FILESMID24832ScRenditionWeb [Accessed 3 July 2008].
Johns P. Activity analysis on the workload of the diabetes specialist nurse. J Diabetes Nurs 1997; 1: 50–53.
Miles P. How to keep sane as a DSN (and have a lunch break!). J Diabetes Nurs 2002; 6: 24–26.
TheResearchGroup,Cambridgeshire County Council. 2003. The 2001 Census Profile of Peterborough. //www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/EODEA099-0B7A-42A2-A459055AB91FA9A8/0/PeterboroughProfile.pdf [Accessed 14 July 2008].
Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, et al Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycaemic control among vul-nerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med 2000; 108: 20–26.
Marrero DG, Vandagriff JL, Kronz K, et al. Using telecommunication technology to manage children with diabetes: the computer-linked out-patient clinic. Diabetes Educator 1995; 21: 313–319.
Gardener P, Vick C, Sunderland J, A DSN telephone audit: one-way to manage telephone work. J Diabetes Nurs 2003; 7: 387–389.
Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives. www.nmc-uk.org. [Accessed 5 September 2008].
Robinson D, Anderson M, Erpenbeck P, .Telephone advice: new solutions for old problems. Nurse Practitioner 1997; 22: 179–192.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Copyright © 2008 FEND
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.